Last Updated: 06 Jan 2003

Welcome to CAAP (Citizens Against Airport Pollution)

A League of Neighborhoods
P.O. Box 26142, San Jose, CA 95159
(866) 263-4163 (voice and fax)

[ Feedback to webmaster@caap.org ]

Your are the visitor since 05 Aug 2002.

Search our website

Enter Your Search Query

Sign our Guest Book


LINKS:

 Bylaws

 History

 CAAP Newsletters

 Mailbag & Aviation News

 Archives of CAAP Home Pages

 Student Research Information

 Bay Area FAA Contacts

 Government Contacts

 Other Groups 

 Other Links of Interest

 Stage 4 Aircraft Update

CAAP December newsletter now available!


Great news!  The San Jose Airport has released an Internet flight tracking system called AirportMonitor on their web site:



Royal Commission has deep concerns about aviation growth climate
 

Full story below provided by:

Jack Saporito, Executive Director
The Alliance of Residents Concerning O'Hare
Past-president, US-Citizens Aviation Watch Association (1997-2002)
POB 1702
Arlington Hts., IL 60006-1702
Phone: (847) 506-0670
Fax: (847) 506-0202
Email: <jack@areco.org>

STEERING COMMITTEE:

  Dr. Kenneth Hayes, M.D.
  Co-Chair
  Physician

  Dr. Walter Bowman, M.D.
  Co-Chair
  Physician

  Robert Harmssen, 
  Co-Vice Chair
  Attorney at Law

  Lenora Porcella
  Co-Vice Chair
  Travel Agent

  Lilian Dennis,
  Secretary
  Small Business Owner

  Sharen Dains,
  Treasurer
  Freelance Court Reporter

  Lyle Johnson,
  Santa Clara Advisor
  Attorney at Law
 

TASKFORCE:

  Lenora Porcella,
  Newsletter Editor
  Travel Agent

   Sandy Bauer,
  Webmistress 

      

Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution

The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution is an independent standing body established in 1970 to advise the Queen, government, Parliament and the public on environmental issues.

Special Report - The Environmental Effects of Civil Aircraft in Flight - Download from http://www.rcep.org.uk/avreport.html

Conclusions and recommendations

6.1 The Commission has expressed deep concerns about the environmental consequences of the growth in air transport on a number of occasions. In this Report we have examined the larger-scale impacts of aviation, both on surface UV radiation through changes in atmospheric ozone and on climate.

6.2 The Commission has particular concerns about the contribution that aircraft emissions will make to climate change if this growth goes unchecked. The total radiative forcing due to aviation is probably some three times that due to the carbon dioxide emissions alone. This contrasts with factors generally in the range 1 - 1.5 for most other human activities.

6.3 The ambitious targets for technological improvement in some industry announcements are clearly aspirations rather than projections; IPCC's projections are already optimistic. Despite the considerable opportunities for incremental improvements to the environmental performance of individual aircraft, these will not offset the effects of growth. Kerosene will continue to be the industry fuel for the foreseeable future. A non-incremental change could result from radically new airframe designs, with improved fuel efficiency and possibly lower noise and emissions, but this change will not affect the industry for decades and even then will only affect large long-haul aircraft.

6.4 Short-haul passenger flights, such as UK domestic and European journeys, make a disproportionately large contribution to the global environmental impacts of air transport. These impacts are very much larger than those from rail transport over the same point-to-point journey.

6.5 We are also concerned by the growth in air freight. Carbon dioxide emissions and fuel use per tonnekilometre for rail freight are a factor of 20 - 100 lower than for air. For marine freight, fuel use and carbon dioxide emissions are a factor of 2 or more lower again. Air freight is so much more environmentally damaging than other transport modes that it must be reserved for very high value, and usually perishable, goods. Any proposal to expand air freight movements must be examined with particular care.

6.6 If the reductions in carbon dioxide emissions from ground-level activities recommended in the Commission's Twenty-second Report are achieved, and the growth in air transport projected by IPCC materialises, then air travel will become one of the major sources of anthropogenic climate change by 2050. The Commission fears that the government shows little sign of having recognised these problems, but regards further substantial growth in aviation as inevitable. We recognise that the problems of reducing the impact of air transport are more challenging than action in some other sectors contributing to climate change. But it is imperative that environmental priorities are not simply sidelined as being too difficult.

6.7 We have made recommendations in this Report which encompass a wide range of measures that the government ought to be taking to reduce demand for air travel and to moderate the damage caused by the future growth that does take place:

  • impose climate protection charges for aircraft taking off and landing within the EU, and press for such charges to be adopted beyond Europe (paragraphs 5.5 to 5.14)

  • restrict airport development to encourage greater competition for, and raise the implicit price of, the available take-off and landing slots, in order to optimise the use of those slots towards longer-haul flights and to increase the prospects for a modal shift to rail for domestic journeys (paragraphs 5.16 to 5.18)

  • encourage a modal shift to more environmentally benign methods of transport for short-haul flights, including the development of major airports into land-air hubs integrated with an enhanced rail network (paragraphs 5.19 to 5.23)

  • support technological development to lessen the damage done by air travel, continuing airframe improvements and optimising aircraft routeing (paragraphs 5.24 to 5.31)

  • include international aviation in the emissions trading scheme that is envisaged as one of the Kyoto Protocol's implementing mechanisms (paragraphs 5.32 to 5.36).

6.8 We urge the government to seize the opportunity presented by its forthcoming White Paper to implement our recommendations at the domestic level, and to argue for their adoption by the EU, and globally, where necessary and appropriate. We believe that the arguments put forward in this Report are sufficient to show that if no limiting action is taken, the rapid growth in air transport will proceed in fundamental contradiction to the government's stated goal of sustainable development.

      
      

Airport Noise Report Line - (408) 452-0707

(24 hour reporting of loud aircraft, curfew penetrations, engine run-ups in the middle of the night)

San Jose Airport Noise Center

The city of San Jose has a new Info line that is a 24/7 fax. The number is 408-277-8500 with four digit codes for the following:

  • 1103 - Airport Acoustical Treatment Program
  • 1106 - Airport Noise Monitoring Center
  • 1109 - General Information

South Bay residents are encouraged to report intrusive aircraft overflight noise on San Francisco Airport's toll free citizen complaint number. Callers with a complaint should state the time, date, duration.

The toll free number is 1 (877) 206-8290


Do you Smell Noxious Aircraft Fumes?

Do the Fumes make you close your windows or run into your House?

Do you keep your kids from playing outside or stop working in your Yard  when the fumes are thick?  Are you or your children having any problems with Asthma?

Has Bay Area Air Quality Management (1-800-334-6367) told you that they have no "jurisdiction" over Air Craft Fumes? Have you been told by the Airport staff that these fumes are not Airport related; or that the Airport never receives any fume complaints?

We now have a  "Fumes" Complaint Line!

As a result of resident concerns, Jerry Hetnar, Environmental Department, of the San Jose Airport is logging dates, times, and addresses of people who are smelling Aircraft fumes.  His phone number is 408-501-7706.  You can even leave a message after working hours with your fumes complaint
date and time.

Don't hesitate to call and log your fume concern!  It is only by speaking up and raising our voices that we will get heard!  Many people calling will lead to some kind of investigation of those pungent fumes and perhaps something to monitor our most precious resource --- OUR AIR!!


Live Radar Flight Tracksallows you to watch the movement of flights and air traffic patterns currently in use within the Bay Area. This map will show flight tracks of aircraft arriving and departing from SFO, Oakland, and San Jose Airport and other nearby general aviation airports. Red plane icons are arrivals, green are departures, black are General Aviation or small propeller aircraft and helicopters. The white icons are aircraft   transiting the area and bypassing local airports. The icon sizes are uniform regardless of the actual size of the aircraft. 

Map showing the cummulative effect of 17 of Santa Clara County's leading 'High Tech' Hazardous Air Pollutants identified by SVTC that are contained in the CEP database and have an EPA Benchmark for cancer. The risk for cancer is much higher than the Clean Air Act goal of 1 in 1 million individualsanywhere in Santa Clara County. The cancer risk ranges from 18 to 876 additional cancer cases - a high of over 800 additional cancer cases per million individuals - resulting from exposure to the subset of High Tech chemicals that SVTC has identified.

      

[ Feedback to webmaster@caap.org]